Digital investigations continue to grow in scale and complexity, putting increased pressure on examiners to move faster while maintaining defensibility and analytical depth.
Artificial intelligence is increasingly being invoked in child exploitation cases as a defense strategy, with claims that images are AI-generated, deepfakes, and that no real child is being depicted—all to create confusion and undermine proof.
Federal agencies are frequent targets of sophisticated malicious actors seeking to exploit sensitive data, disrupt critical operations, or undermine public trust. When an incident occurs, identifying the root cause is not merely important—it is essential to understanding the scope of impact and preventing recurrence. Achieving this level of insight often requires a comprehensive forensic examination across multiple platforms, including servers, workstations, and mobile devices. A deep forensic dive enables investigators to reconstruct events, uncover hidden indicators of compromise, and preserve evidence necessary for remediation, reporting, and potential legal action.
As digital crime grows more complex, disconnected tools and delayed evidence can slow investigations. Magnet One changes that.
Digital evidence is no longer a niche concern reserved for technology-focused litigators. It is now a foundational component of modern civil practice. Nearly every civil dispute involves data generated by smartphones, applications, cloud services, and networked systems. Messages replace letters; location data replaces eyewitnesses, and system logs preserve events long after human memory fades.
Digital forensics is as much about the hardworking people who bring their knowledge and experience to every case as it is about the technology. Having the right tools in place matters, but so do the processes, physical setup, and training that support them.
Air‑gapped forensic labs are essential for protecting sensitive evidence—but that isolation often slows investigations. As mobile devices increase in volume and complexity, fragmented workflows and manual evidence transfer can create costly bottlenecks.
In this webinar, learn how modern mobile forensics teams are bridging the air gap without compromising security. Drawing on real‑world law enforcement lab workflows, we’ll explore how combining Graykey with Magnet Forensics mobile solutions enables faster extractions, streamlined processing, and scalable collaboration entirely within an offline environment.
See how Axiom Express Extraction, Graykey Fastrak, and automated processing workflows help labs free up access devices, run simultaneous extractions across multiple workstations, and deliver analysis‑ready mobile evidence faster—while preserving the integrity of an air‑gapped lab. Whether you’re tackling backlogs or planning to scale, this session shows how to unlock speed, efficiency, and confidence across your mobile forensics workflow.
Magnet Forensics has been named a winner in the 2026 Globee® Awards for Cybersecurity, recognized for its innovation and leadership in forensic-grade remote incident analysis and response.
Artificial intelligence is increasingly becoming a regular part of our daily lives—including modern criminal prosecutions and courtroom practice.
In this episode of Legal Unpacked, Justin Fitzsimmons introduces a clear three-dimensional AI framework for lawyers, distinguishing capabilities, tools, and applications, and explaining the current reality of narrow AI that drives most systems in use today.
Prosecutors will gain a practical understanding of generative AI, including how it creates content, where it fails, and why documented breakdowns in the legal profession matter for credibility and risk assessment.
The presentation also addresses the ethical and professional responsibilities associated with AI-assisted work and provides a structured approach for evaluating when and how generative AI may be used responsibly in prosecutorial functions.
The session concludes by grounding generative AI–created trial exhibits in evidentiary foundations, focusing on authenticity, reliability, and admissibility in court.
In many forensic labs, especially those operating in air-gapped or high security environments, critical time is lost to fragmented workflows.
