Discover how to accelerate your investigations with Magnet One Case Stream—the fastest and easiest way to acquire, share, and review digital evidence from your data sources. In this episode, we’ll showcase the first Case Stream workflow connecting directly to Graykey, and demonstrate how it helps your lab uncover critical insights faster while enabling seamless collaboration … Continued
AI is not difficult to understand, but many people struggle to explain it, especially when conversations jump straight to headlines, products, and legal implications. This eBook provides lawyers with a clear and durable model of AI using a three-dimensional framework.
We’re excited to introduce AP100 – Axiom Digital Evidence Reporting: A Prosecutor’s Toolkit, a new three day training course built specifically for prosecutors to help effectively utilize Axiom reports in your cases.
Law enforcement and investigative teams are inundated with devices, data, and demands. Digital forensics labs are often overwhelmed, leaving critical evidence to languish in long queues and potentially compromising justice. Whether you’re handling several cases a week or hundreds per month, see how Magnet Automate can modernize your lab like never before.
Child sexual abuse material (CSAM) investigations are evolving rapidly, driven by growing volumes of mixed media, increasing cross-agency coordination needs, and emerging synthetic content that complicates triage.
Hi, all! This is Jessica Hyde and I am so excited to share the winners from the Magnet Virtual Summit 2026 CTF, as well as images, the challenges, and the questions! The Magnet Virtual Summit 2026 CTF was another exciting competition. We had over 3,950 people register for the CTF and 1,041 folks solved at least one question —record breaking participation!
Every week, the Washington ICAC Task Force receives hundreds of cyber tips, each carrying the potential to rescue a child. To keep pace, Seattle PD adopted Magnet Griffeye® Enterprise as a central hub for digital media intelligence—enabling faster collaboration, smarter triage, and built‑in safeguards for investigator wellbeing.
As more digital activity migrates to the cloud, investigators need to adjust their legal processes to align with the realities of online data storage. In this episode of Legal Unpacked, Justin Fitzsimmons will examine how to draft effective search warrants for cloud-based data, including the need to understand the types of user information providers actually collect and store.
You’ll learn the importance of reviewing and preserving key service documents, including terms of service, privacy policies, cookie policies, and screenshots of provider-facing dashboards or archive tools, to demonstrate what data exists and how the companies retain it.
There will also be an emphasis on defining, with precision, the types of data relevant to the investigation and supporting each request with the information courts expect: a clear explanation of the specific data sought, how that data is generated through user or system activity, where it resides within the provider’s infrastructure, why it is relevant to proving elements of the offense, and how it may help attribute the activity to a specific user. This approach provides a practical framework for satisfying the requirements of probable cause and particularity, while making your request intelligible and credible to both courts and service providers.
Artificial intelligence is increasingly being invoked in child exploitation cases as a defense strategy, with claims that images are AI-generated, deepfakes, and that no real child is being depicted—all to create confusion and undermine proof.
Artificial intelligence is increasingly becoming a regular part of our daily lives—including modern criminal prosecutions and courtroom practice.
In this episode of Legal Unpacked, Justin Fitzsimmons introduces a clear three-dimensional AI framework for lawyers, distinguishing capabilities, tools, and applications, and explaining the current reality of narrow AI that drives most systems in use today.
Prosecutors will gain a practical understanding of generative AI, including how it creates content, where it fails, and why documented breakdowns in the legal profession matter for credibility and risk assessment.
The presentation also addresses the ethical and professional responsibilities associated with AI-assisted work and provides a structured approach for evaluating when and how generative AI may be used responsibly in prosecutorial functions.
The session concludes by grounding generative AI–created trial exhibits in evidentiary foundations, focusing on authenticity, reliability, and admissibility in court.
